Dominique Meeùs
Dernière modification le
Bibliographie :
table des matières,
index des notions —
Retour à la page personnelle
Auteurs : A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z,
Auteur-œuvres : A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z,
Dans l'édition Vintage que j'ai en mains, il manque les pages qui donnent la date et l'ISBN. La première édition Vintage est de 1966. La préface est datée « Halifax, August 1963 ». Mon édition Vintage est donc antérieure à une édition Penguin révisée en 1968.
Il y avait eu déjà chez Random House, New York une édition hardcover de 1964 (imprint Pantheon).
Ci-dessous, je renvoie aux pages dans la pagination de l'édition Vintage sur laquelle je travaille.
⁂
Ce livre pose le problème de classe en soi et classe pour soi.
En soi, il n'y a de classe que dans une relation d'exploitation. Dans le capitalisme, le groupe social des capitalistes prélève un surplus du travail des prolétaires. C'est ce qui les constitue en classes. Il n'y a de classe, en soi, objectivement, que dans une telle relation. On pourrait citer l'exemple aussi de la féodalité européenne, où, par leur statut, les seigneurs sont en droit de prélever un surplus du travail des serfs.
On dit classe en soi, parce que c'est une situation de fait, indépendamment de l'opinion ou du sentiment des intéressés. On dit classe pour soi quand on vise la conscience ou l'organisation d'une classe, ce qui ne pourrait se dire que s'il y a classe en soi.
La particularité de ce livre, c'est de décrire la formation, la création (The making…) d'une conscience de classe dans une population travailleuse qui a une certaine communauté de conditions de vie ou de travail, mais peut difficilement être considérée comme classe en soi. Il s'agit d'ouvriers salariés du début du capitalisme industriel, moderne ; d'autres ouvriers dans toute sorte de statuts différents, de maître, compagnon, apprenti, ou toute autre catégorie d'artisan plus ou moins indépendant de l'époque ; de personnel domestique ; mais aussi de paysans participant occasionnellement au travail industriel en filant ou en tissant à domicile.
Tous sans doute voient une partie du fruit de leur travail accaparé par d'autres, mais pas de la même manière, ni par les mêmes autres, sauf à rassembler ces autres comme l'élite, les riches, les possédants (les nobles et les bourgeois).
Je pose là un problème théorique auquel je n'ai pas de réponse. Mais une conception scientifique de l'histoire, c'est parler ce qui s'est réellement passé et non tordre les faits pour les conformer à un apriori théorique. La question ouverte de la classe en soi ou pour soi ne diminue donc en rien la valeur de ce livre.
⁂
The moderate Yorkshire reformer, the Reverend Christopher Wyvill, as to whose devotion there can be no question, nevertheless believed that a reform on the principle of universal suffrage "could not be effected without a Civil War":
[…]
" If Mr Paine should be able to rouze up the lower classes," he wrote in 1792, "their interference will probably be marked by wild work, and all we now possess, whether in private property or public liberty, will be at the mercy of a lawless and furious rabble."
Le chapitre 2 (page 26), « Christian and Apollyon », expose l'extrême diversité de sectes protestantes.
Gerrard Winstanley, the Digger, helps us to understand the movement of feeling, turning away from the "kingdom without" to the "kingdom within":
The living soul and the creating spirit are not one, but divided, the one looking after a kingdom without him, the other drawing him to look and wait for a kingdom within him, which moth and rust doth not corrupt and thieves cannot break through and steal. This is a kingdom that will abide, the outward kingdom must be taken from you.
Ils ne pouvaient pas, alors, recourir à Signal pour communiquer discrètement.
In August the L.C.S. was renewing correspondence with societies in Derby, Stockport, Manchester, Nottingham and Coventry — asking them to "point out a safer mode of conveyance for our letters than the post"…
Et encore :
Meanwhile, the secret executive of the Society went through its own troubles. It had difficulty in finding “proper ways and means for safe conveyance” for its letters to provincial clubs.
His division met in a private house: “I met with many inquisitive, clever, upright men… We had book subscriptions… W e had Sunday evening parties… readings, conversations, and discussions."
“The moral effects of the Society were very great indeed. It induced men to read books instead of spending their time at public houses. It taught them to think, to respect themselves, and to desire to educate their children. It elevated them in their own opinions.”
E.P. Thompson cite une contribution d'A Journeyman Cotton Spinner dans le Black Dwarf du 30 septembre 1818. (C'est l'année de la naissance, en mai, de Karl Marx.) Je ne trouve pas en ligne ce texte exceptionnel d'un ouvrier du coton. Je publie donc ici ce que Thompson en cite, et il en cite peut-être tout ou la plus grande partie.
First, then, as to the employers : with very few exceptions, they are a set of men who have sprung from the cotton-shop without education or address, except so much as they have acquired by their intercourse with the little world of merchants on the exchange at Manchester; but to counterbalance that deficiency, they give you enough of appearances by an ostentatious display of elegant mansions, equipages, liveries, parks, hunters, hounds, &c. which they take care to shew off to the merchant stranger in the most pompous manner. Indeed their houses are gorgeous palaces, far surpassing in bulk and extent the neat charming retreats you see round London… but the chaste observer of the beauties of nature and art combined will observe a woeful deficiency of taste. They bring up their families at the most costly schools, determined to give their offspring a double portion of what they were so deficient in themselves. Thus with scarcely a second idea in their heads, they are literally petty monarchs, absolute and despotic, in their own particular districts ; and to support all this, their whole time is occupied in contriving how to get the greatest quantity of work turned off with the least expence… In short, I will venture to say, without fear of contradiction, that there is a greater distance observed between the master there and the spinner, than there is between the first merchant in London and his lowest servant or the lowest artisan. Indeed there is no comparison. I know it to be a fact, that the greater part of the master spinners are anxious to keep wages low for the purpose of keeping the spinners indigent and spiritless… as for the purpose of taking the surplus to their own pockets.
The master spinners are a class of men unlike all other master tradesmen in the kingdom. They are ignorant, proud, and tyrannical. What then must be the men or rather beings who are the instruments of such masters ? Why, they have been for a series of years, with their wives and their families, patience itself — bondmen and bondwomen to their cruel taskmasters. It is in vain to insult our common understandings with the observation that such men are free ; that the law protects the rich and poor alike, and that a spinner can leave his master if he does not like the wages. True ; so he can : but where must he go ? why to another, to be sure. Well : he goes ; he is asked where did you work last : ‘did he discharge you ?’ No ; we could not agree about wages. Well I shall not employ you nor anyone who leaves his master in that manner. Why is this ? Because there is an abominable combination existing amongst the masters, first established at Stockport in 1802, and it has since become so general, as to embrace all the great masters for a circuit of many miles round Manchester, though not the little masters : they are excluded. They are the most obnoxious beings to the great ones that can be imagined… When the combination first took place, one of their first articles was, that no master should take on a man until he had first ascertained whether his last master had discharged him. What then is the man to do ? If he goes to the parish, that grave of all independence, he is there told — We shall not relieve you ; if you dispute with your master, and don't support your family, we will send you to prison ; so that the man is bound, by a combination of circumstances, to submit to his master. He cannot travel and get work in any town like a shoe-maker, joiner, or taylor ; he is confined to the district.
The workmen in general are an inoffensive, unassuming, set of well-informed men, though how they acquire their information is almost a mystery to me. They are docile and tractable, if not goaded too much ; but this is not to be wondered at, when we consider that they are trained to work from six years old, from five in a morning to eight and nine at night. Let one of the advocates for obedience to his master take his stand in an avenue leading to a factory a little before five o'clock in the morning, and observe the squalid appearance of the little infants and their parents taken from their beds at so early an hour in all kinds of weather ; let him examine the miserable pittance of food, chiefly composed of water gruel and oatcake broken into it, a little salt, and sometimes coloured with a little milk, together with a few potatoes, and a bit of bacon or fat for dinner ; would a London mechanic eat this ? There they are, (and if late a few minutes, a quarter of a day is stopped in wages) locked up until night in rooms heated above the hottest days we have had this summer, and allowed no time, except three-quarters of an hour at dinner in the whole day : whatever they eat at any other time must be as they are at work. The negro slave in the West Indies, if he works under a scorching sun, has probably a little breeze of air sometimes to fan him : he has a space of ground, and time allowed to cultivate it. The English spinner slave has no enjoyment of the open atmosphere and breezes of heaven. Locked up in factories eight stories high, he has no relaxation till the ponderous engine stops, and then he goes home to get refreshed for the next day ; no time for sweet association with his family ; they are all alike fatigued and exhausted. This is no over-drawn picture : it is literally true. I ask again, would the mechanics in the South of England submit to this ?
When the spinning of cotton was in its infancy, and before those terrible machines for superseding the necessity of human labour, called steam engines, came into use, there were a great number of what were then called little masters ; men who with a small capital, could procure a few machines, and employ a few hands, men and boys (say to twenty or thirty), the produce of whose labour was all taken to Manchester central mart, and put into the hands of brokers… The brokers sold it to the merchants, by which means the master spinner was enabled to stay at home and work and attend to his workmen. The cotton was then always given out in its raw state from the bale to the wives of the spinners at home, when they heat and cleansed it ready for the spinners in the factory. By this they could earn eight, ten, or twelve shillings a week, and cook and attend to their families. But none are thus employed now ; for all the cotton is broke up by a machine, turned by the steam engine, called a devil : so that the spinners wives have no employment, except they go to work in the factory all day at what can be done by children for a few shillings, four or five per week. If a man then could not agree with his master, he left him, and could get employed elsewhere. A few years, however, changed the face of things. Steam engines came into use, to purchase which, and to erect buildings sufficient to contain them and six or seven hundred hands, required a great capital. The engine power produced a more marketable (though not a better) article than the little master could at the same price. The consequence was their ruin in a short time ; and the overgrown capitalists triumphed in their fall ; for they were the only obstacle that stood between them and the complete controul of the workmen.
Various disputes then originated between the workmen and masters as to the fineness of the work, the workmen being paid according to the number of hanks or yards of thread he produced from a given quantity of cotton, which was always to be proved by the overlooker, whose interest made it imperative on him to lean to his master, and call the material coarser than it was. If the workman would not submit he must summon his employer before a magistrate ; the whole of the acting magistrates in that district, with the exception of two worthy clergymen, being gentlemen who have sprung from the same source with the master cotton spinners. The employer generally contented himself with sending his overlooker to answer any such summons, thinking it beneath him to meet his servant. The magistrate's decision was generally in favour of the master, though on the statement of the overlooker only. The workman dared not appeal to the sessions on account of the expense…
These evils to the men have arisen from that dreadful monopoly which exists in those districts where wealth and power are got into the hands of the few, who, in the pride of their hearts, think themselves the lords of the universe.