Javascript is disabled or not supported in your browser. JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use WIKINDX fully. Enable JavaScript through your browser options then
try again
, otherwise, try using a different browser.
Bibliographie générale
Wikindx
Home
Preferences
Statistics
User Logon
About Wikindx
Resources
Bookmarks...
Add bookmark
Random Resource
Last Multi View
Search
Quick Search
Advanced Search
Quick List All...
Creator asc.
Title asc.
Publisher asc.
Year desc.
Timestamp desc.
Popularity desc.
Views desc.
Downloads desc.
Maturity desc.
Browse...
Types
Creators
Cited
Collections...
ALL
Book
Journal
Magazine
Newspaper
Proceedings
Thesis Abstracts
Web Site
Publishers...
ALL
Book
Conference
Distributor
Institution
Years
Keywords
Categories
Subcategories
Languages
System Users
Departments
Institutions
Category Tree
Metadata
Random...
Quote
Paraphrase
Keywords
List Resources
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 (Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography)
Order by:
First Creator
Title
Publisher
Publication Year
Timestamp
Ascending
Descending
Add to basket
Export to COinS
Use all checked:
Use all displayed:
Use all in list:
Weinberg, S. (1993).
Dreams of a final theory: Search for the ultimate laws of nature
. Londres: Hutchinson Radius.
Last edited by: Dominique Meeùs 2011-05-03 08:46:32
Pop. 0%
Finally one can imagine a category of experiments that
refute
well-accepted theories, theories that have become part of the standard consensus of physics.
Under this category I can find no examples whatever in the past one hundred years.
There are of course many cases where theories have been found to have a narrower realm of application than had been thought. Newton’s theory of motion does not apply at high speeds. Parity, the symmetry between right and left, does not work in the weak forces — and so on. But in this century no theory that has been generally accepted as valid by the world of physics has turned out simply to be a mistake, the way that Ptolemy’s epicycle theory of planetary motion or the theory that heat is a fluid called caloric were mistakes. Yet in this century, as we have seen in the cases of general relativity and the electroweak theory, the consensus in favor of physical theories has often been reached on the basis of aesthetic judgments before the experimental evidence for these theories became really compelling. I see in this the remarkable power of the physicist’s sense of beauty acting in conjunction with and sometimes even in opposition to the weight of experimental evidence.